|
|
|
|
|
Margot Higgins - Environmental News Network |
|
||||
|
Over
the past year, condors have pried
shingles off buildings,
stripping
windshield wipers off cars and approached people for
food. Human conflict isn't the only problem wildlife managers
are experiencing in their effort to bring America's largest bird
of prey back into the wild. According to the report, much of the condor's
habituation to humans has to do with the way they have been
raised. "Many condors are reared in captivity by humans
using
condor-shaped
puppets, and this has created birds that
readily approach people, cars and buildings," explained
Meretsky. "Behavioral problems have been common in released
young condors that were taken from their parents and reared by
puppets in isolation, but not in young condors that were raised
by their parents. Unfortunately, despite this important
difference, program managers have continued to release
puppet-reared birds to the wild instead of limiting releases to
parent-reared birds." The study strongly urges that future releases be
limited to parent-reared birds, especially ones that are raised
free of all contact with humans in field enclosures that do not
resemble human structures. Only one release site, near Big Sur, California, has
had a purely parent-reared group of condors, which for a while
was essentially free of human conflict, Meretsky said.
Nevertheless, these birds recently expanded their range and
joined one of the groups containing puppet-reared birds. Lately
they are reported to have followed the puppet-reared birds into
developed areas. "Mixing the two stocks in the wild has resulted in
the transfer of bad habits from the puppet-reared to the
parent-reared birds," Meretsky said. "All misbehaving
birds in the wild should be re-trapped and returned to
captivity, since they
pose a risk
of passing on their bad
behavior to birds released in the future." "My concern is about when a condor attacks a
3-year-old child," Meretsky added. "We can't wait
until there is a public
outcry. There is too much support and
funding to be lost. The condor does not need to share the
negative reputation of the wolf. If someone gets injured that is
a real possibility." While the recovery program costs $1.5 million a year in
tax dollars and private donations, condors face the same risk of
dying from lead poisoning as they did when the program began in
1982. We are losing more than a quarter of the population
each year," said co-author Nole Snyder, who wrote "The
California Condor: A
Saga
of Natural History and
Conservation," released in January. "The death rate of
released birds has been too great to sustain a wild
population." Carcasses
contaminated with lead bullet fragments have
killed at least four condors since March, the authors noted.
Seventeen lead shotgun pellets were found in one dead condor's
digestive system. "To re-establish any wild species, the main causes
of its extinction must be identified and eliminated before
releases of captive animals are attempted. This basic
tenet
is
being neglected in the current condor release program even
though alternative ammunitions are now available," said
Snyder. The authors of the report say the most promising
solution is to require hunters to use a new non-toxic ammunition
made from a composite of tungsten, tin and bismuth in areas
where wild condors live. They blame government agencies for not
taking a more active role in promoting the use of non-toxic
ammunition in areas where condors feed. "While this is a good alternative, these bullets
are not available on the market," said Greg Austin, a
wildlife biologist for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
"We have to be careful how we approach this. It is a
touchy
subject and we don't want people to think we are
shoving
something down their throats." While Austin admitted the recovery effort needs to
focus more on lead poisoning and condor behavior, he said this
shouldn't take away from the program's accomplishments. "It
took 25 years to de-list the peregrine falcon. We are only at
nine or 10 years and we have a long way to go." The authors of the study hope their work can be applied
to other recovery programs for endangered species. "The primary lesson that needs to be learned from
this experience is that each recovery program has
unique
aspects," said Meretsky. "A research component that
watches what is going on and learns from that is essential.
There was no research component to this program at all." |
|
|
GLOSSARY |
|
|
spotted: seen |
pose a risk: mean a danger |
|